Meta Platforms vs Sify Technologies
META and SIFY side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How META and SIFY compare
Meta Platforms grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (27.5% versus 12.5% for Sify Technologies).
Meta Platforms keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 31.1% compared with −3.0% at Sify Technologies.
Meta Platforms pays a dividend yielding 0.33%; Sify Technologies does not pay one.
Meta Platforms scores higher on the StockData Score (21 against 4 for Sify Technologies), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | META | SIFY |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.6T | – |
| Share price | $628.77 | $13.08 |
| Change, 1 year | −0.47% | 21.2% |
| Change, 5 years | 82.1% | −44.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.39 | 0.96 |
| Employees | 79K | 4,331 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 21 (better) | 4 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Performance score | 6 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 21.4× | – |
| P/S | 6.7× | – |
| P/B | 5.9× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 15.4× | – |
| P/FCF | 56.1× | – |
| PEG | 0.54 | – |
| FCF yield | 1.8% | – |
| Fair value | $681.13 | – |
| Margin of safety | 7.7% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 27.5% (better) | 12.5% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 18.5% (better) | 13.0% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 28.6% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 29.8% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 18.4% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 81.0% (better) | 40.2% |
| Operating margin | 32.9% (better) | 6.7% |
| Net margin | 31.1% (better) | −3.0% |
| FCF margin | 11.9% (better) | −10.7% |
| Return on equity | 32.3% (better) | −7.0% |
| Return on invested capital | 33.5% (better) | 4.4% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.31 (better) | 2.04 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.01 (better) | 3.35 |
| Interest coverage | – | 0.8× |
| Current ratio | 1.90 (better) | 0.74 |
| Altman Z-score | 6.35 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.33% | – |
| Payout ratio | 7.2% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 1 | – |
| Buyback yield | 0.00% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 0.33% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 66.6% | 0.77% |
| Held by insiders | 13.4% | 83.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$255M | – |
| Superinvestors holding | 25 | – |
Go deeper
- META stock overview
- META income statement
- META valuation and score
- SIFY stock overview
- SIFY income statement
- SIFY valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.