Mayville Engineering vs Proto Labs
MEC and PRLB side by side, both in fabricated metal products, except machinery and transportation equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MEC and PRLB compare
Proto Labs is the larger company, worth 4.6 times as much as Mayville Engineering ($1.6B against $358M).
Mayville Engineering grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (14.8% versus 11.8% for Proto Labs).
Proto Labs keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 6.0% compared with −2.3% at Mayville Engineering.
Proto Labs scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 6 for Mayville Engineering), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MEC | PRLB |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $358M | $1.6B |
| Share price | $14.02 | $69.11 |
| Change, 1 year | −16.8% | 41.0% |
| Change, 5 years | −9.6% | 30.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.92 | 1.29 |
| Employees | 2,400 | 2,280 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 14 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 48.3× |
| P/S | 0.6× (better) | 2.8× |
| P/B | 1.1× (better) | 2.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 20.0× |
| P/FCF | – | 33.9× |
| FCF yield | −1.9% | 2.9% (better) |
| Fair value | $22.81 | $46.68 |
| Margin of safety | 38.5% (better) | −48.1% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 14.8% (better) | 11.8% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.9% (better) | 4.2% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −216% | 136% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −219% | 134% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −14.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 9.2% | 45.2% (better) |
| Operating margin | −1.4% | 7.3% (better) |
| Net margin | −2.3% | 6.0% (better) |
| FCF margin | −1.1% | 8.4% (better) |
| Return on equity | −5.0% | 5.1% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −2.4% | 5.6% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | −0.6× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.74 | 3.65 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.98 | 10.97 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | – | 0.99% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.99% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 84.5% | 94.2% |
| Held by insiders | 3.4% | 1.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$3.5M | −$3.1M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 11.3% | 2.6% |
Go deeper
- MEC stock overview
- MEC income statement
- MEC valuation and score
- PRLB stock overview
- PRLB income statement
- PRLB valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.