Malibu Boats vs Twin Vee PowerCats
MBUU and VEEE side by side, both in transportation equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MBUU and VEEE compare
Malibu Boats is the larger company, worth 101 times as much as Twin Vee PowerCats ($389M against $3.8M).
Malibu Boats grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (17.1% versus −5.8% for Twin Vee PowerCats).
Malibu Boats keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 0.86% compared with −82.2% at Twin Vee PowerCats.
Twin Vee PowerCats scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 5 for Malibu Boats), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MBUU | VEEE |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $389M | $3.8M |
| Share price | $19.76 | $6.70 |
| Change, 1 year | −25.5% | −90.9% |
| Change, 5 years | −72.1% | −99.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.96 | 0.44 |
| Employees | 3,000 | 70 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 8 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 49.4× | – |
| P/S | 0.4× | 0.3× (better) |
| P/B | 0.7× | 0.3× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 30.7× | – |
| P/FCF | 338× | – |
| FCF yield | 0.30% (better) | −195% |
| Fair value | $8.85 | $18.05 |
| Margin of safety | −123% | 62.9% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 17.1% (better) | −5.8% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −0.26% | 6.0% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −56.6% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −59.2% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −55.6% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 16.1% (better) | −2.0% |
| Operating margin | 1.8% (better) | −84.7% |
| Net margin | 0.86% (better) | −82.2% |
| FCF margin | 0.12% (better) | −58.1% |
| Return on equity | 1.6% (better) | −77.4% |
| Return on invested capital | 2.3% (better) | −74.9% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.33 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 7.75 | – |
| Interest coverage | 3.3× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.52 (better) | 1.50 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.35 (better) | −4.00 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | – | −151% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% (better) | −151% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 91.5% | 2.2% |
| Held by insiders | 2.6% | – |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$772K |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.9% | – |
Go deeper
- MBUU stock overview
- MBUU income statement
- MBUU valuation and score
- VEEE stock overview
- VEEE income statement
- VEEE valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.