Mativ vs Ranpak
MATV and PACK side by side, both in paper and allied products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MATV and PACK compare
Mativ is the larger company, worth 2.2 times as much as Ranpak ($683M against $305M).
Ranpak grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.3% versus −0.43% for Mativ).
Mativ keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 4.6% compared with −8.3% at Ranpak.
Mativ pays a dividend yielding 3.2%; Ranpak does not pay one.
Mativ scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 6 for Ranpak), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MATV | PACK |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $683M | $305M |
| Share price | $12.38 | $3.55 |
| Change, 1 year | −0.96% | −29.0% |
| Change, 5 years | −61.7% | −91.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.21 | 2.02 |
| Employees | 5,000 | 800 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 (better) | 6 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 7.5× | – |
| P/S | 0.3× (better) | 0.7× |
| P/B | 1.5× | 0.6× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.4× (better) | 14.9× |
| P/FCF | 6.9× | – |
| FCF yield | 14.4% | – |
| Fair value | $22.57 | $4.17 |
| Margin of safety | 45.1% (better) | 14.9% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −0.43% | 8.3% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 13.1% (better) | 5.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 19.4% | 33.8% (better) |
| Operating margin | 3.7% (better) | −1.7% |
| Net margin | 4.6% (better) | −8.3% |
| FCF margin | 5.0% | – |
| Return on equity | 21.2% (better) | −6.6% |
| Return on invested capital | 4.3% (better) | −0.64% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 2.09 | 0.79 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 4.19 (better) | 8.01 |
| Interest coverage | 1.0× (better) | −0.2× |
| Current ratio | 1.93 (better) | 1.79 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.40 (better) | 0.48 |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.2% | – |
| Payout ratio | 24.6% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | −25.6% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 3.2% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 93.9% | 89.9% |
| Held by insiders | 2.3% | 45.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$18.7K |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.6% | 4.2% |
Go deeper
- MATV stock overview
- MATV income statement
- MATV valuation and score
- PACK stock overview
- PACK income statement
- PACK valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.