StockData

Metalpha Technology vs Sharplink

MATH and SBET side by side, both in finance services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How MATH and SBET compare

Sharplink grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (303% versus −16.7% for Metalpha Technology).

Metalpha Technology keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 3.5% compared with −2012% at Sharplink.

Sharplink scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 8 for Metalpha Technology), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricMATHSBET
Size and price
Market cap–$1.2B
Share price$1.04$5.61
Change, 1 year−62.9%−51.5%
Change, 5 years−35.4%−85.6%
Beta (5Y)0.712.91
Employees3515
StockData Score
Total score89 (better)
Valuation score01 (better)
Growth score12 (better)
Performance score2 (better)0
Health score56 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S–23.1×
P/B–0.6×
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−16.7%303% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average177% (better)65.2%
Net income growth (TTM)−91.9%–
EPS growth (TTM)−92.9%–
Profitability
Gross margin41.4%–
Operating margin3.6% (better)−2006%
Net margin3.5% (better)−2012%
Return on equity–−40.6%
Return on invested capital–−32.3%
Financial health
Debt / equity–0.00
Interest coverage76.1×–
Current ratio1.128.08 (better)
Altman Z-score–117.51
Piotroski F-score23 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield–0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions0.85%49.9%
Held by insiders14.0%6.4%
Insider net buying, 12 months–−$47.9M
Short interest, % of float0.11%19.4%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.