Maase vs Silvercrest Asset Management
MAAS and SAMG side by side, both in services allied with the exchange of securities. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MAAS and SAMG compare
Silvercrest Asset Management grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (1.2% versus −76.5% for Maase).
Silvercrest Asset Management keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 0.74% compared with −102% at Maase.
Silvercrest Asset Management pays a dividend yielding 7.5%; Maase does not pay one.
Silvercrest Asset Management scores higher on the StockData Score (4 against 3 for Maase), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MAAS | SAMG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $133M |
| Share price | $9.98 | $11.22 |
| Change, 1 year | 169% | −20.7% |
| Change, 5 years | −97.2% | −31.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.37 | 0.89 |
| Employees | 100 | 171 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 93.5× |
| P/S | – | 1.0× |
| P/B | – | 2.9× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 23.5× |
| P/FCF | – | 23.8× |
| FCF yield | – | 4.2% |
| Fair value | – | $9.64 |
| Margin of safety | – | −16.4% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −76.5% | 1.2% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −0.83% | 3.0% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −85.9% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −83.1% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −11.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 13.7% | – |
| Operating margin | −12.9% | 2.5% (better) |
| Net margin | −102% | 0.74% (better) |
| FCF margin | −58.2% | 4.4% (better) |
| Return on equity | −7.1% | 1.8% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −0.71% | 8.0% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.01 | – |
| Interest coverage | −16.9× | 4.9× (better) |
| Current ratio | 10.67 | – |
| Altman Z-score | – | 2.45 |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 7.5% |
| Payout ratio | – | 696% |
| Buyback yield | – | 6.7% |
| Shareholder yield | – | 14.2% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 0.07% | 39.2% |
| Held by insiders | 81.0% | 15.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | $719K |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 4.0% |
Go deeper
- MAAS stock overview
- MAAS income statement
- MAAS valuation and score
- SAMG stock overview
- SAMG income statement
- SAMG valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.