LTC Properties vs Strawberry Fields REIT
LTC and STRW side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How LTC and STRW compare
LTC Properties is the larger company, worth 13 times as much as Strawberry Fields REIT ($2.4B against $178M).
On earnings, LTC Properties is cheaper: it trades at 16.1× trailing earnings, against 57.0× for Strawberry Fields REIT.
LTC Properties grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (59.8% versus 10.1% for Strawberry Fields REIT).
LTC Properties keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 38.9% compared with 1.8% at Strawberry Fields REIT.
Both pay dividends: LTC Properties yields 4.8% and Strawberry Fields REIT 5.3%.
LTC Properties scores higher on the StockData Score (19 against 10 for Strawberry Fields REIT), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | LTC | STRW |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $2.4B | $178M |
| Share price | $43.88 | $12.55 |
| Change, 1 year | 20.9% | 6.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 28.2% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.41 | 0.06 |
| Employees | 25 | 9 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 19 (better) | 10 |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Growth score | 3 | 3 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 16.1× (better) | 57.0× |
| P/S | 6.8× | 1.1× (better) |
| P/B | 1.9× (better) | 14.8× |
| EV/EBITDA | 9.2× | 1.5× (better) |
| PEG | 30.06 | 2.32 (better) |
| Fair value | $46.70 | $60.06 |
| Margin of safety | 6.0% | 79.1% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 59.8% (better) | 10.1% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 10.5% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 62.7% (better) | −59.8% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 50.0% (better) | −64.5% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 0.81% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 62.6% (better) | 55.0% |
| Net margin | 38.9% (better) | 1.8% |
| Return on equity | 12.2% | 21.5% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 19.8% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Interest coverage | – | 1.7× |
| Altman Z-score | 2.19 (better) | 0.66 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 4.8% | 5.3% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 83.3% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 0.00% | – |
| Buyback yield | −12.0% | – |
| Shareholder yield | −7.3% | 5.3% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 79.7% | 29.4% |
| Held by insiders | 2.2% | 43.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $1.1M (better) | $60.0K |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.5% | 1.5% |
Go deeper
- LTC stock overview
- LTC income statement
- LTC valuation and score
- STRW stock overview
- STRW income statement
- STRW valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.