LTC Properties vs SmartStop Self Storage REIT
LTC and SMA side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How LTC and SMA compare
LTC Properties and SmartStop Self Storage REIT are about the same size, with market caps of $2.3B and $2.2B.
LTC Properties grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (59.8% versus 20.7% for SmartStop Self Storage REIT).
LTC Properties keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 38.9% compared with 10.3% at SmartStop Self Storage REIT.
Both pay dividends: LTC Properties yields 4.8% and SmartStop Self Storage REIT 3.7%.
LTC Properties scores higher on the StockData Score (19 against 2 for SmartStop Self Storage REIT), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | LTC | SMA |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $2.3B | $2.2B |
| Share price | $43.28 | $39.86 |
| Change, 1 year | 21.2% | 21.6% |
| Change, 5 years | 26.4% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.41 | 0.36 |
| Employees | 25 | 1,000 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 19 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 15.9× | – |
| P/S | 6.7× (better) | 6.9× |
| P/B | 1.8× (better) | 1.9× |
| EV/EBITDA | 9.0× (better) | 15.1× |
| PEG | 29.65 | – |
| Fair value | $46.52 | $23.67 |
| Margin of safety | 7.0% (better) | −68.4% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 59.8% (better) | 20.7% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 10.5% | 17.8% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 62.7% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 50.0% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 0.81% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 59.8% |
| Operating margin | 62.6% (better) | 22.9% |
| Net margin | 38.9% (better) | 10.3% |
| Return on equity | 12.2% (better) | 2.8% |
| Return on invested capital | 19.8% (better) | 5.1% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Interest coverage | – | 1.4× |
| Altman Z-score | 2.17 (better) | 1.23 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 4.8% (better) | 3.7% |
| Payout ratio | 83.3% | 272% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 0.00% | – |
| Buyback yield | −12.2% | – |
| Shareholder yield | −7.4% | 3.7% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 79.7% | 93.0% |
| Held by insiders | 2.2% | 5.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $1.1M (better) | −$146K |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.5% | 9.9% |
Go deeper
- LTC stock overview
- LTC income statement
- LTC valuation and score
- SMA stock overview
- SMA income statement
- SMA valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.