Laird Superfood vs CN Healthy Food Tech
LSF and UCFI side by side, both in food and kindred products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How LSF and UCFI compare
CN Healthy Food Tech is the larger company, worth 9.5 times as much as Laird Superfood ($288M against $30.4M).
Laird Superfood grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (73.3% versus 33.9% for CN Healthy Food Tech).
CN Healthy Food Tech keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 24.6% compared with −3.4% at Laird Superfood.
Laird Superfood scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 7 for CN Healthy Food Tech), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | LSF | UCFI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $30.4M | $288M |
| Share price | $2.72 | $5.51 |
| Change, 1 year | −5.6% | 0.00% |
| Change, 5 years | −82.3% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.32 | −0.20 |
| Employees | 26 | 10 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 (better) | 7 |
| Valuation score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 2 | 2 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 35.8× |
| P/S | 0.4× (better) | 9.5× |
| P/B | 2.8× (better) | 12.3× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 20.4× |
| FCF yield | – | −6.5% |
| Fair value | $3.09 | $3.33 |
| Margin of safety | 11.9% (better) | −65.5% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 73.3% (better) | 33.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 14.1% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 1.8% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −1.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 32.4% | 72.6% (better) |
| Operating margin | −9.4% | 42.7% (better) |
| Net margin | −3.4% | 24.6% (better) |
| FCF margin | – | −61.5% |
| Return on equity | −22.9% | 39.2% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Interest coverage | – | 40.4× |
| Current ratio | 3.05 (better) | 2.35 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.42 | 17.77 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 17.5% | 7.6% |
| Held by insiders | – | 95.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $350K | – |
Go deeper
- LSF stock overview
- LSF income statement
- LSF valuation and score
- UCFI stock overview
- UCFI income statement
- UCFI valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.