Logitech International vs NetApp
LOGI and NTAP side by side, both in computer and office equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How LOGI and NTAP compare
NetApp is the larger company, worth 2.6 times as much as Logitech International ($36.5B against $14.3B).
On earnings, Logitech International is cheaper: it trades at 18.1× trailing earnings, against 26.2× for NetApp.
NetApp grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (12.7% versus 5.7% for Logitech International).
NetApp keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 21.8% compared with 16.4% at Logitech International.
Both pay dividends: Logitech International yields 1.7% and NetApp 1.1%.
Logitech International scores higher on the StockData Score (19 against 18 for NetApp), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | LOGI | NTAP |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $14.3B | $36.5B |
| Share price | $100.60 | $186.08 |
| Change, 1 year | −16.1% | 68.5% |
| Change, 5 years | 23.3% | 116% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.17 | 1.23 |
| Employees | 7,300 | 12K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 19 (better) | 18 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Dividend score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 18.1× (better) | 26.2× |
| P/S | 2.9× (better) | 5.6× |
| P/B | 6.6× (better) | 24.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | 14.5× (better) | 17.6× |
| P/FCF | 15.0× (better) | 22.2× |
| PEG | 0.62 (better) | 8.39 |
| FCF yield | 6.7% (better) | 4.5% |
| Fair value | $117.46 | $151.82 |
| Margin of safety | 14.4% (better) | −22.6% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 5.7% | 12.7% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −1.6% | 1.7% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 22.6% (better) | 21.1% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 25.9% (better) | 25.4% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −2.7% | 14.5% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 45.5% | 80.3% (better) |
| Operating margin | 17.8% | 28.5% (better) |
| Net margin | 16.4% | 21.8% (better) |
| FCF margin | 19.2% | 25.4% (better) |
| Return on equity | 38.2% | 115% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 111% | 528% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 1.66 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | −0.54 |
| Current ratio | 2.13 (better) | 1.24 |
| Altman Z-score | 8.63 (better) | 3.62 |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 (better) | 7 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.7% (better) | 1.1% |
| Payout ratio | – | 29.0% |
| Years of dividend growth | 8 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 12.7% (better) | 1.6% |
| Buyback yield | 4.1% (better) | 2.3% |
| Shareholder yield | 5.8% (better) | 3.4% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | – | 99.0% |
| Held by insiders | 0.24% | 0.44% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.6M (better) | −$46.3M |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.5% | 4.4% |
Go deeper
- LOGI stock overview
- LOGI income statement
- LOGI valuation and score
- NTAP stock overview
- NTAP income statement
- NTAP valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.