LanzaTech Global vs Comstock
LNZA and LODE side by side, both in chemicals and allied products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How LNZA and LODE compare
Comstock is the larger company, worth 2.3 times as much as LanzaTech Global ($127M against $55.3M).
LanzaTech Global grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (43.8% versus −52.2% for Comstock).
LanzaTech Global keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 296% compared with −3680% at Comstock.
LanzaTech Global scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 5 for Comstock), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | LNZA | LODE |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $55.3M | $127M |
| Share price | $4.22 | $1.67 |
| Change, 1 year | −75.6% | −39.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −99.6% | −90.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.99 | 1.33 |
| Employees | 192 | 46 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 (better) | 5 |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 0.3× | – |
| P/S | 0.9× (better) | 95.6× |
| P/B | 0.2× (better) | 0.9× |
| FCF yield | −61.1% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 43.8% (better) | −52.2% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 50.4% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | −152% |
| Operating margin | −61.0% (better) | −3535% |
| Net margin | 296% (better) | −3680% |
| FCF margin | −58.0% | – |
| Return on equity | 146% (better) | −38.2% |
| Return on invested capital | −37.2% (better) | −40.2% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Interest coverage | – | −67.3× |
| Current ratio | 2.48 | 3.31 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | −3.18 | −1.98 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | – | −49.8% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% (better) | −49.8% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 25.4% | 58.2% |
| Held by insiders | – | 9.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $4.3M | $4.4M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 16.6% |
Go deeper
- LNZA stock overview
- LNZA income statement
- LNZA valuation and score
- LODE stock overview
- LODE income statement
- LODE valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.