Lindsay vs Toro
LNN and TTC side by side, both in industrial and commercial machinery and computer equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How LNN and TTC compare
Toro is the larger company, worth 9.2 times as much as Lindsay ($10.0B against $1.1B).
On earnings, Lindsay is cheaper: it trades at 20.1× trailing earnings, against 28.3× for Toro.
Toro grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (5.2% versus −6.0% for Lindsay).
Lindsay keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 8.8% compared with 7.6% at Toro.
Both pay dividends: Lindsay yields 1.4% and Toro 1.5%.
Lindsay scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 16 for Toro), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | LNN | TTC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.1B | $10.0B |
| Share price | $107.25 | $105.89 |
| Change, 1 year | −4.4% | 45.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −32.4% | 1.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.66 | 0.96 |
| Employees | 1,083 | – |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 17 (better) | 16 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 4 | 4 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividend score | 4 | 4 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 20.1× (better) | 28.3× |
| P/S | 1.7× (better) | 2.1× |
| P/B | 2.2× (better) | 7.5× |
| EV/EBITDA | 11.3× (better) | 17.0× |
| P/FCF | 31.4× | 14.1× (better) |
| FCF yield | 3.2% | 7.1% (better) |
| Fair value | $125.62 | $92.49 |
| Margin of safety | 14.6% (better) | −14.5% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −6.0% | 5.2% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 2.3% | 5.9% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −24.8% | 9.1% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −21.4% | 13.3% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 6.6% (better) | 0.91% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 28.9% | 33.4% (better) |
| Operating margin | 10.5% (better) | 10.3% |
| Net margin | 8.8% (better) | 7.6% |
| FCF margin | 5.5% | 15.0% (better) |
| Return on equity | 10.7% | 26.4% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 11.9% | 17.6% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.23 (better) | 0.72 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.83 | 1.24 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | 8.7× |
| Current ratio | 3.15 (better) | 1.58 |
| Altman Z-score | 4.99 | 5.28 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.4% | 1.5% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 27.7% | 41.3% |
| Years of dividend growth | 16 | 16 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 2.8% | 8.7% (better) |
| Buyback yield | 7.4% (better) | 3.6% |
| Shareholder yield | 8.8% (better) | 5.0% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 103% | 94.3% |
| Held by insiders | 1.5% | 0.39% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$49.4K (better) | −$14.2M |
| Short interest, % of float | 9.2% | 3.9% |
Go deeper
- LNN stock overview
- LNN income statement
- LNN valuation and score
- TTC stock overview
- TTC income statement
- TTC valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.