StockData

LifeMD vs Starling Oncology

LFMD and STLN side by side, both in health services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How LFMD and STLN compare

Starling Oncology is the larger company, worth 5.0 times as much as LifeMD ($428M against $85.8M).

Starling Oncology grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (34.6% versus 3.8% for LifeMD).

LifeMD keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 0.12% compared with −5.7% at Starling Oncology.

LifeMD scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 7 for Starling Oncology), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricLFMDSTLN
Size and price
Market cap$85.8M$428M
Share price$1.78$4.20
Change, 1 year−65.3%26.9%
Change, 5 years−60.8%−45.5%
Beta (5Y)1.711.72
Employees389641
StockData Score
Total score12 (better)7
Valuation score2 (better)1
Growth score3 (better)2
Performance score3 (better)2
Health score4 (better)2
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S0.5× (better)0.7×
P/B10.8×–
P/FCF–22.7×
FCF yield−12.9%4.4% (better)
Fair value$2.38–
Margin of safety25.3%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)3.8%34.6% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average39.1% (better)21.8%
Profitability
Gross margin86.1%–
Operating margin−14.7%−3.4% (better)
Net margin0.12% (better)−5.7%
FCF margin−6.7%3.0% (better)
Return on equity6.5%–
Return on invested capital–−96.2%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.00–
Interest coverage–−2.0×
Current ratio0.901.11 (better)
Altman Z-score−3.441.93 (better)
Piotroski F-score5 (better)3
Dividends and buybacks
Payout ratio1545%–
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions44.9%43.4%
Held by insiders18.2%56.6%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$54.1K (better)−$11.1M

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.