StockData

loanDepot vs Walker & Dunlop

LDI and WD side by side, both in finance services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How LDI and WD compare

Walker & Dunlop is the larger company, worth 8.6 times as much as loanDepot ($1.3B against $152M).

loanDepot grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (9.2% versus 0.87% for Walker & Dunlop).

Walker & Dunlop keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −2.6% compared with −6.8% at loanDepot.

Walker & Dunlop pays a dividend yielding 7.1%; loanDepot does not pay one.

Walker & Dunlop scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 4 for loanDepot), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricLDIWD
Size and price
Market cap$152M$1.3B
Share price$0.451$38.30
Change, 1 year−84.6%−42.6%
Change, 5 years−93.2%−74.7%
Beta (5Y)1.561.18
Employees4,7001,466
StockData Score
Total score49 (better)
Valuation score12 (better)
Growth score1 (better)0
Performance score22
Health score00
Dividend score05 (better)
Valuation
P/S0.1× (better)1.1×
P/B–0.8×
P/FCF0.6× (better)0.9×
FCF yield175% (better)117%
Fair value–$79.95
Margin of safety–52.1%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)9.2% (better)0.87%
Revenue growth, 5Y average−22.7%2.6% (better)
Net income growth (TTM)–−128%
EPS growth (TTM)–−130%
EPS growth, 5Y average–−26.6%
Profitability
Net margin−6.8%−2.6% (better)
FCF margin21.4%123% (better)
Return on equity–−1.9%
Financial health
Altman Z-score0.060.99 (better)
Piotroski F-score–3
Dividends and buybacks
Dividend yield–7.1%
Years of dividend growth–7
Dividend growth, 5Y average–13.2%
Buyback yield–1.5%
Shareholder yield0.00%8.6% (better)
Ownership
Held by institutions15.9%86.7%
Held by insiders38.3%4.0%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$8.4M$990K (better)
Short interest, % of float10.6%6.5%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.