StockData

Sealsq vs SmartKem

LAES and SMTK side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How LAES and SMTK compare

SmartKem grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (229% versus −99.8% for Sealsq).

SmartKem keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −4479% compared with −136776% at Sealsq.

SmartKem scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 3 for Sealsq), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricLAESSMTK
Size and price
Market cap–$265K
Share price$1.25$0.204
Change, 1 year−76.6%−99.7%
Beta (5Y)1.79−0.00
Employees18528
StockData Score
Total score39 (better)
Valuation score01 (better)
Growth score12 (better)
Performance score01 (better)
Health score25 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S–0.5×
P/B–0.0×
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−99.8%229% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average−71.9%49.3% (better)
Profitability
Gross margin34520% (better)58.5%
Operating margin−159196%−1373% (better)
Net margin−136776%−4479% (better)
FCF margin−128000%–
Return on equity−10.2% (better)−532%
Return on invested capital−97.4% (better)−269%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.00 (better)0.00
Interest coverage−593.8×–
Current ratio14.43 (better)8.79
Altman Z-score–−16.90
Piotroski F-score4 (better)2
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield–0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions6.4%2.3%
Held by insiders0.80%67.5%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$1.2M–
Short interest, % of float3.3%103%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.