StockData

Standard BioTools vs Prenetics Global

LAB and PRE side by side, both in drugs. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How LAB and PRE compare

Prenetics Global grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (480% versus −4.8% for Standard BioTools).

Standard BioTools keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 100% compared with −40.8% at Prenetics Global.

Standard BioTools scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 10 for Prenetics Global), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricLABPRE
Size and price
Market cap$252M–
Share price$0.643$17.64
Change, 1 year−45.0%48.4%
Change, 5 years−85.7%−88.1%
Beta (5Y)1.530.60
Employees38998
StockData Score
Total score12 (better)10
Valuation score4 (better)0
Growth score02 (better)
Performance score33
Health score55
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E2.9×–
P/S3.0×–
P/B0.5×–
FCF yield−32.7%–
Fair value$4.90–
Margin of safety86.9%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−4.8%480% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average−9.2%7.2% (better)
Profitability
Gross margin50.5%52.8% (better)
Operating margin−113%−48.1% (better)
Net margin100% (better)−40.8%
FCF margin−97.6%−23.8% (better)
Return on equity17.6% (better)−23.1%
Return on invested capital−60.8%−29.0% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.000.00
Current ratio9.10 (better)2.97
Altman Z-score−0.34–
Piotroski F-score35 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%–
Ownership
Held by institutions75.4%–
Held by insiders70.2%14.2%
Insider net buying, 12 months$550K$1000K (better)
Superinvestors holding1–
Short interest, % of float1.9%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.