Katapult vs Upbound
KPLT and UPBD side by side, both in miscellaneous equipment rental and leasing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How KPLT and UPBD compare
Upbound is the larger company, worth 2.0 times as much as Katapult ($1.5B against $749M).
Katapult grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (51.0% versus 3.2% for Upbound).
Upbound keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 2.4% compared with −7.4% at Katapult.
Upbound pays a dividend yielding 6.2%; Katapult does not pay one.
Upbound scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 4 for Katapult), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | KPLT | UPBD |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $749M | $1.5B |
| Share price | $8.83 | $25.09 |
| Change, 1 year | 40.2% | 43.7% |
| Change, 5 years | −91.7% | −44.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.57 | 1.30 |
| Employees | 87 | 15K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 | 17 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 13.2× |
| P/S | 0.8× | 0.3× (better) |
| P/B | – | 2.0× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 5.1× |
| P/FCF | – | 3.4× |
| PEG | – | 0.16 |
| FCF yield | −1.9% | 29.6% (better) |
| Fair value | – | $33.72 |
| Margin of safety | – | 25.6% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 51.0% (better) | 3.2% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 3.4% | 10.8% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 31.8% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 31.0% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −19.6% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | −38.7% | 49.7% (better) |
| Operating margin | −15.9% | 5.5% (better) |
| Net margin | −7.4% | 2.4% (better) |
| FCF margin | −1.4% | 9.2% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 15.5% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 30.6% |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | – | 2.5× |
| Altman Z-score | 0.15 | 2.69 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 6.2% |
| Payout ratio | – | 82.3% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 7 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 5.7% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 6.2% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 2.1% | 99.3% |
| Held by insiders | 58.7% | 3.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$6.5K | $1.8M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.9% | 14.8% |
Go deeper
- KPLT stock overview
- KPLT income statement
- KPLT valuation and score
- UPBD stock overview
- UPBD income statement
- UPBD valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.