Kenon vs Ormat Technologies
KEN and ORA side by side, both in electric services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How KEN and ORA compare
Ormat Technologies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (28.6% versus 16.1% for Kenon).
Ormat Technologies keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 11.1% compared with 7.6% at Kenon.
Ormat Technologies pays a dividend yielding 0.51%; Kenon does not pay one.
Ormat Technologies scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 3 for Kenon), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | KEN | ORA |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $5.7B |
| Share price | $61.80 | $93.24 |
| Change, 1 year | 11.3% | −18.5% |
| Change, 5 years | 38.1% | 16.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.84 | 0.57 |
| Employees | 348 | 1,512 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 3 | 12 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 43.2× |
| P/S | – | 4.7× |
| P/B | – | 2.2× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 10.8× |
| PEG | – | 2.16 |
| FCF yield | – | −4.1% |
| Fair value | – | $91.38 |
| Margin of safety | – | −2.0% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 16.1% | 28.6% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 17.7% (better) | 7.0% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −88.9% | 0.79% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −88.8% | −0.92% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −33.0% | 4.1% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 16.8% | 28.4% (better) |
| Operating margin | 7.2% | 16.7% (better) |
| Net margin | 7.6% | 11.1% (better) |
| FCF margin | 19.2% (better) | −19.4% |
| Return on equity | 4.1% | 5.2% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 2.8% | 8.2% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.11 | 0.04 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.16 (better) | −0.48 |
| Interest coverage | 0.7× | 1.2× (better) |
| Current ratio | 4.94 (better) | 0.92 |
| Altman Z-score | – | 1.33 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.51% |
| Payout ratio | 404% | 21.8% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 1.8% |
| Shareholder yield | – | 0.51% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 13.9% | 88.0% |
| Held by insiders | 0.17% | 0.28% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$6.2M |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.12% | 10.5% |
Go deeper
- KEN stock overview
- KEN income statement
- KEN valuation and score
- ORA stock overview
- ORA income statement
- ORA valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.