J&J Snack Foods vs Seneca Foods
JJSF and SENEA side by side, both in food and kindred products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How JJSF and SENEA compare
J&J Snack Foods is the larger company, worth 1.4 times as much as Seneca Foods ($1.7B against $1.2B).
On earnings, Seneca Foods is cheaper: it trades at 10.2× trailing earnings, against 34.0× for J&J Snack Foods.
Seneca Foods grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (12.1% versus −4.7% for J&J Snack Foods).
Seneca Foods keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 6.6% compared with 3.2% at J&J Snack Foods.
J&J Snack Foods pays a dividend yielding 3.6%; Seneca Foods does not pay one.
Seneca Foods scores higher on the StockData Score (19 against 15 for J&J Snack Foods), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | JJSF | SENEA |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.7B | $1.2B |
| Share price | $88.39 | $176.47 |
| Change, 1 year | 7.6% | 49.2% |
| Change, 5 years | −38.9% | 288% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.31 | 0.30 |
| Employees | 1,800 | 2,995 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 15 | 19 (better) |
| Valuation score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 34.0× | 10.2× (better) |
| P/S | 1.1× | 0.7× (better) |
| P/B | 1.9× | 1.5× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 11.9× | 6.3× (better) |
| P/FCF | 17.9× | 7.4× (better) |
| PEG | 3.10 | 0.07 (better) |
| FCF yield | 5.6% | 13.6% (better) |
| Fair value | $92.95 | $283.74 |
| Margin of safety | 4.9% | 37.8% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −4.7% | 12.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 9.1% (better) | 2.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −41.2% | 98.4% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −39.4% | 101% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 28.5% (better) | 3.9% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 31.3% (better) | 13.2% |
| Operating margin | 3.9% | 8.2% (better) |
| Net margin | 3.2% | 6.6% (better) |
| FCF margin | 6.0% | 9.0% (better) |
| Return on equity | 5.3% | 16.1% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 5.5% | 15.3% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.03 | 0.02 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.26 | 0.02 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 27.8× (better) | 11.1× |
| Current ratio | 2.34 | 2.60 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 4.50 (better) | 4.19 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 9 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.6% | – |
| Payout ratio | 124% | 0.02% |
| Years of dividend growth | 2 | – |
| Buyback yield | 4.6% (better) | 1.2% |
| Shareholder yield | 8.2% (better) | 1.2% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 80.0% | 60.9% |
| Held by insiders | 20.8% | 5.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $0 (better) | −$323K |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.5% | – |
Go deeper
- JJSF stock overview
- JJSF income statement
- JJSF valuation and score
- SENEA stock overview
- SENEA income statement
- SENEA valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.