Professional Diversity Network vs TaoWeave
IPDN and TWAV side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How IPDN and TWAV compare
Professional Diversity Network is the larger company, worth 2.9 times as much as TaoWeave ($13.9M against $4.7M).
TaoWeave grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (4.1% versus −5.1% for Professional Diversity Network).
Professional Diversity Network keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −144% compared with −272% at TaoWeave.
Professional Diversity Network pays a dividend yielding 3.1%; TaoWeave does not pay one.
TaoWeave scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 8 for Professional Diversity Network), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | IPDN | TWAV |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $13.9M | $4.7M |
| Share price | $0.965 | $1.22 |
| Change, 1 year | −98.7% | −52.5% |
| Change, 5 years | −99.9% | −99.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.04 | 1.87 |
| Employees | 34 | 7 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 | 9 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 | 3 |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 2.3× | 1.9× (better) |
| P/B | 1.0× | 0.9× (better) |
| FCF yield | −16.2% | – |
| Fair value | $8.98 | $2.32 |
| Margin of safety | 89.2% (better) | 47.4% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −5.1% | 4.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.0% (better) | −30.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 37.9% | 52.3% (better) |
| Operating margin | −144% | −122% (better) |
| Net margin | −144% (better) | −272% |
| FCF margin | −36.9% | – |
| Return on equity | −95.7% | −79.7% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −76.9% (better) | −82.6% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Current ratio | 0.78 | 4.45 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | −8.31 (better) | −47.73 |
| Piotroski F-score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.1% | – |
| Buyback yield | −51.3% | – |
| Shareholder yield | −48.2% | 0.00% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 0.03% | 5.1% |
| Held by insiders | 16.3% | 7.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | $0 |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.49% | 0.84% |
Go deeper
- IPDN stock overview
- IPDN income statement
- IPDN valuation and score
- TWAV stock overview
- TWAV income statement
- TWAV valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.