Interparfums vs Oddity Tech
IPAR and ODD side by side, both in soap, detergents, and cleaning preparations; perfumes, cosmetics, and other toilet preparations. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How IPAR and ODD compare
Oddity Tech grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (25.2% versus 2.6% for Interparfums).
Oddity Tech keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 13.7% compared with 11.3% at Interparfums.
Interparfums pays a dividend yielding 2.4%; Oddity Tech does not pay one.
Interparfums scores higher on the StockData Score (20 against 10 for Oddity Tech), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | IPAR | ODD |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $4.3B | – |
| Share price | $133.19 | $19.90 |
| Change, 1 year | 53.0% | −49.6% |
| Change, 5 years | 43.9% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.85 | 1.69 |
| Employees | 662 | 658 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 20 (better) | 10 |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 25.1× | – |
| P/S | 2.8× | – |
| P/B | 4.9× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 15.6× | – |
| P/FCF | 17.5× | – |
| PEG | 2.18 | – |
| FCF yield | 5.7% | – |
| Fair value | $138.78 | – |
| Margin of safety | 4.0% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 2.6% | 25.2% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 22.5% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 3.4% | 9.1% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 3.7% | 9.8% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 34.1% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 64.8% | 72.7% (better) |
| Operating margin | 17.9% (better) | 14.7% |
| Net margin | 11.3% | 13.7% (better) |
| FCF margin | 16.2% (better) | 10.3% |
| Return on equity | 19.5% | 32.6% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 20.8% | 60.9% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.22 (better) | 1.47 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.29 (better) | −1.48 |
| Interest coverage | 44.3× | – |
| Current ratio | 3.33 | 5.24 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 8.26 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.4% | – |
| Payout ratio | 60.2% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 5 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 57.5% | – |
| Buyback yield | 0.24% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 2.6% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 67.1% | 66.4% |
| Held by insiders | 22.3% | 24.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$4.0M | −$3.0M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 7.8% | 8.3% |
Go deeper
- IPAR stock overview
- IPAR income statement
- IPAR valuation and score
- ODD stock overview
- ODD income statement
- ODD valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.