StockData

Intrusion vs Silicom

INTZ and SILC side by side, both in computer and office equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How INTZ and SILC compare

Silicom grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (6.6% versus −16.4% for Intrusion).

Silicom keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −18.5% compared with −194% at Intrusion.

Silicom scores higher on the StockData Score (6 against 2 for Intrusion), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricINTZSILC
Size and price
Market cap$10.1M–
Share price$0.414$28.84
Change, 1 year−74.3%98.2%
Change, 5 years−99.5%−35.6%
Beta (5Y)1.241.15
Employees52123
StockData Score
Total score26 (better)
Valuation score1 (better)0
Growth score01 (better)
Performance score1 (better)0
Health score05 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S1.8×–
FCF yield−89.0%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−16.4%6.6% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average1.2% (better)−10.4%
Profitability
Gross margin74.1% (better)30.6%
Operating margin−194%−19.8% (better)
Net margin−194%−18.5% (better)
FCF margin−158%−5.4% (better)
Return on equity−95.2%−9.5% (better)
Return on invested capital−273%−13.9% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity–0.00
Current ratio0.393.06 (better)
Altman Z-score−17.05–
Piotroski F-score46 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%–
Ownership
Held by institutions5.6%43.1%
Held by insiders17.6%6.1%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$3.4K (better)−$3.7M
Short interest, % of float1.8%3.4%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.