International Seaways vs Nordic American Tankers
INSW and NAT side by side, both in water transportation. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How INSW and NAT compare
International Seaways grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (100% versus −16.6% for Nordic American Tankers).
International Seaways keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 68.2% compared with 4.2% at Nordic American Tankers.
International Seaways pays a dividend yielding 12.0%; Nordic American Tankers does not pay one.
International Seaways scores higher on the StockData Score (21 against 2 for Nordic American Tankers), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | INSW | NAT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $5.2B | – |
| Share price | $105.23 | $6.72 |
| Change, 1 year | 96.5% | 83.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 575% | 248% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.45 | 0.41 |
| Employees | 2,763 | 18 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 21 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 5.0× | – |
| P/S | 3.4× | – |
| P/B | 2.2× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 4.4× | – |
| Fair value | $170.93 | – |
| Margin of safety | 38.4% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 100% (better) | −16.6% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 14.9% (better) | −3.8% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 384% (better) | −73.7% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 381% (better) | −72.7% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −29.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 62.3% |
| Operating margin | 69.9% (better) | 15.9% |
| Net margin | 68.2% (better) | 4.2% |
| Return on equity | 49.0% (better) | 2.6% |
| Return on invested capital | 34.6% (better) | 5.9% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.30 (better) | 0.95 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.20 (better) | 8.16 |
| Interest coverage | 25.2× (better) | 1.3× |
| Current ratio | 6.69 (better) | 2.24 |
| Altman Z-score | 6.15 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 12.0% | – |
| Payout ratio | 59.3% | 621% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 0 |
| Shareholder yield | 12.0% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 81.8% | – |
| Held by insiders | 31.8% | 5.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$176M | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 10.1% | 8.8% |
Go deeper
- INSW stock overview
- INSW income statement
- INSW valuation and score
- NAT stock overview
- NAT income statement
- NAT valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.