International Flavors & Fragrances vs Westlake
IFF and WLK side by side, both in chemicals and allied products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How IFF and WLK compare
International Flavors & Fragrances is the larger company, worth 2.5 times as much as Westlake ($20.7B against $8.1B).
Westlake grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−0.37% versus −4.6% for International Flavors & Fragrances).
Both pay dividends: International Flavors & Fragrances yields 2.0% and Westlake 3.3%.
International Flavors & Fragrances scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 8 for Westlake), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | IFF | WLK |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $20.7B | $8.1B |
| Share price | $81.16 | $63.61 |
| Change, 1 year | 24.1% | 1.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −45.9% | −34.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.99 | 0.94 |
| Employees | 22K | 15K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 2 | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 2.1× | 0.7× (better) |
| P/B | 1.5× | 0.9× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 15.2× (better) | 16.3× |
| P/FCF | 38.3× (better) | 677× |
| FCF yield | 2.6% (better) | 0.15% |
| Fair value | $83.46 | $26.29 |
| Margin of safety | 2.8% (better) | −142% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −4.6% | −0.37% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 16.5% (better) | 8.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 37.5% (better) | 10.8% |
| Operating margin | 7.6% (better) | −3.8% |
| Net margin | – | −3.9% |
| FCF margin | 5.4% (better) | 0.10% |
| Return on equity | – | −4.9% |
| Return on invested capital | 3.0% (better) | −2.9% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.41 (better) | 0.58 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.01 (better) | 4.29 |
| Interest coverage | 4.0× (better) | −2.0× |
| Current ratio | 2.06 | 2.38 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.64 | 1.83 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 3 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.0% | 3.3% (better) |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 12 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | −12.0% | 14.7% (better) |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.77% |
| Shareholder yield | 2.0% | 4.1% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 111% | 31.1% |
| Held by insiders | 11.1% | 73.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $31.2M (better) | −$10.2M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.8% | 12.0% |
Go deeper
- IFF stock overview
- IFF income statement
- IFF valuation and score
- WLK stock overview
- WLK income statement
- WLK valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.