StockData

Infobird vs MindForge

IFBD and MF side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How IFBD and MF compare

Infobird grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (506% versus −49.9% for MindForge).

MindForge keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −223% compared with −616% at Infobird.

MindForge scores higher on the StockData Score (4 against 3 for Infobird), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricIFBDMF
Size and price
Share price$1.51$17.50
Change, 1 year25.8%−70.1%
Change, 5 years−100.0%–
Beta (5Y)0.942.94
Employees1115
StockData Score
Total score34 (better)
Valuation score00
Growth score2 (better)0
Performance score00
Health score14 (better)
Dividend score00
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)506% (better)−49.9%
Revenue growth, 5Y average−9.7%–
Profitability
Gross margin29.5% (better)−0.54%
Operating margin−607%−98.2% (better)
Net margin−616%−223% (better)
Return on equity−154% (better)−167%
Return on invested capital−140% (better)−140%
Financial health
Debt / equity–0.00
Interest coverage−104.8× (better)−20934.3×
Current ratio1.30 (better)1.14
Piotroski F-score3 (better)2
Ownership
Held by institutions–0.00%
Held by insiders0.00%–
Short interest, % of float0.77%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.