Ibotta vs Thryv
IBTA and THRY side by side, both in business services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How IBTA and THRY compare
Ibotta is the larger company, worth 29 times as much as Thryv ($1.3B against $45.3M).
Thryv grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (11.9% versus −6.6% for Ibotta).
Ibotta keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −3.2% compared with −15.6% at Thryv.
Ibotta scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 8 for Thryv), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | IBTA | THRY |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.3B | $45.3M |
| Share price | $57.59 | $1.02 |
| Change, 1 year | 76.0% | −83.8% |
| Change, 5 years | 127% | −97.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | −0.24 | 1.14 |
| Employees | 800 | 2,729 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 3.9× | 0.1× (better) |
| P/B | 5.5× | 0.4× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 3.6× |
| P/FCF | 17.9× | 1.6× (better) |
| FCF yield | 5.6% | 62.4% (better) |
| Fair value | $28.42 | $10.63 |
| Margin of safety | −103% | 90.4% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −6.6% | 11.9% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | −6.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −111% (better) | −799% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −785% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −70.4% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 78.2% (better) | 67.7% |
| Operating margin | −3.5% | 2.7% (better) |
| Net margin | −3.2% (better) | −15.6% |
| FCF margin | 21.7% (better) | 3.5% |
| Return on equity | −3.7% (better) | −74.8% |
| Return on invested capital | −9.6% | 4.5% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 1.66 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 2.86 |
| Interest coverage | – | 0.7× |
| Current ratio | 1.71 (better) | 0.84 |
| Altman Z-score | 3.86 (better) | −0.17 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 12.3% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 12.3% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 60.3% | 88.0% |
| Held by insiders | 92.4% | 28.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$115M | $7.4M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 151% | 9.2% |
Go deeper
- IBTA stock overview
- IBTA income statement
- IBTA valuation and score
- THRY stock overview
- THRY income statement
- THRY valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.