StockData

iBio vs Cartesian Therapeutics

IBIO and RNAC side by side, both in drugs. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How IBIO and RNAC compare

Cartesian Therapeutics is the larger company, worth 4.1 times as much as iBio ($192M against $47.1M).

iBio keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −3244% compared with −12435% at Cartesian Therapeutics.

iBio scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 1 for Cartesian Therapeutics), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricIBIORNAC
Size and price
Market cap$47.1M$192M
Share price$0.732$6.36
Change, 1 year−41.5%−12.9%
Change, 5 years−99.8%−93.4%
Beta (5Y)1.121.39
Employees2375
StockData Score
Total score9 (better)1
Valuation score1 (better)0
Growth score1 (better)0
Performance score2 (better)0
Health score5 (better)1
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S43.8× (better)188×
P/B0.6×–
FCF yield−58.6%−46.7% (better)
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)115%–
Revenue growth, 5Y average−46.9%−30.0% (better)
Profitability
Operating margin−3491% (better)−15541%
Net margin−3244% (better)−12435%
FCF margin−2566% (better)−8770%
Return on equity−51.8%–
Return on invested capital−728%–
Financial health
Debt / equity0.00–
Current ratio9.48 (better)8.38
Altman Z-score−3.49 (better)−5.12
Piotroski F-score4 (better)2
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions54.0%29.3%
Held by insiders0.47%55.7%
Insider net buying, 12 months$98.1K (better)−$52.9K
Short interest, % of float6.3%14.3%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.