Heartflow vs Kestra Medical Technologies
HTFL and KMTS side by side, both in surgical, medical, and dental instruments and supplies. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How HTFL and KMTS compare
Heartflow is the larger company, worth 2.5 times as much as Kestra Medical Technologies ($4.2B against $1.7B).
Kestra Medical Technologies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (60.7% versus 47.4% for Heartflow).
Heartflow keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −33.1% compared with −140% at Kestra Medical Technologies.
Heartflow scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 5 for Kestra Medical Technologies), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | HTFL | KMTS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $4.2B | $1.7B |
| Share price | $48.46 | $28.64 |
| Change, 1 year | 35.6% | 6.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.70 | 1.21 |
| Employees | 843 | 443 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 (better) | 5 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 | 3 |
| Performance score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 17.7× | 16.0× (better) |
| P/B | 14.9× | – |
| FCF yield | −1.3% (better) | −7.2% |
| Fair value | $9.03 | – |
| Margin of safety | −437% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 47.4% | 60.7% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 81.8% (better) | 53.9% |
| Operating margin | −33.1% (better) | −134% |
| Net margin | −33.1% (better) | −140% |
| FCF margin | −23.5% (better) | −115% |
| Return on equity | −29.4% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Interest coverage | −4937.5× | −19.0× (better) |
| Current ratio | 4.41 | 4.69 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 30.78 (better) | 4.94 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 86.0% | 98.6% |
| Held by insiders | 58.7% | 44.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$143M | −$15.3M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 15.9% | 12.3% |
Go deeper
- HTFL stock overview
- HTFL income statement
- HTFL valuation and score
- KMTS stock overview
- KMTS income statement
- KMTS valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.