Honeywell International vs StandardAero
HON and SARO side by side, both in aircraft and parts. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How HON and SARO compare
Honeywell International is the larger company, worth 7.7 times as much as StandardAero ($70.6B against $9.2B).
On earnings, Honeywell International is cheaper: it trades at 10.1× trailing earnings, against 26.4× for StandardAero.
StandardAero grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.7% versus 3.9% for Honeywell International).
Honeywell International keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 21.0% compared with 5.5% at StandardAero.
Honeywell International pays a dividend yielding 2.2%; StandardAero does not pay one.
Honeywell International scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 8 for StandardAero), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | HON | SARO |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $70.6B | $9.2B |
| Share price | $222.46 | $27.73 |
| Change, 1 year | −44.8% | 5.2% |
| Change, 5 years | 1.8% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.73 | 1.05 |
| Employees | 101K | 8,000 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 16 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Growth score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 10.1× (better) | 26.4× |
| P/S | 2.1× | 1.4× (better) |
| P/B | 3.1× (better) | 3.3× |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.5× (better) | 14.0× |
| P/FCF | 73.0× | 28.5× (better) |
| PEG | 24.46 | – |
| FCF yield | 1.4% | 3.5% (better) |
| Fair value | $429.49 | $31.44 |
| Margin of safety | 48.2% (better) | 11.8% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 3.9% | 8.7% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 2.8% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 15.1% | 88.7% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 16.7% | 90.9% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 1.8% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 37.7% (better) | 15.5% |
| Operating margin | 32.7% (better) | 9.7% |
| Net margin | 21.0% (better) | 5.5% |
| FCF margin | 2.9% | 5.0% (better) |
| Return on equity | 36.0% (better) | 12.9% |
| Return on invested capital | 24.4% (better) | 9.5% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.74 (better) | 0.88 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.83 (better) | 2.79 |
| Interest coverage | – | 3.8× |
| Current ratio | 0.96 | 2.26 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 4.24 (better) | 2.59 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.2% | – |
| Payout ratio | 36.6% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 15 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 4.8% | – |
| Buyback yield | 1.6% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 3.8% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 76.8% | 109% |
| Held by insiders | 0.07% | – |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$12.7M (better) | −$2.5B |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.1% | – |
Go deeper
- HON stock overview
- HON income statement
- HON valuation and score
- SARO stock overview
- SARO income statement
- SARO valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.