Hooker Furnishings vs Virco Mfg
HOFT and VIRC side by side, both in consumer discretionary. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How HOFT and VIRC compare
Hooker Furnishings is the larger company, worth 1.5 times as much as Virco Mfg ($153M against $101M).
Virco Mfg grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−19.0% versus −32.8% for Hooker Furnishings).
Virco Mfg keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −1.3% compared with −8.7% at Hooker Furnishings.
Both pay dividends: Hooker Furnishings yields 3.2% and Virco Mfg 1.6%.
Hooker Furnishings scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 9 for Virco Mfg), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | HOFT | VIRC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $153M | $101M |
| Share price | $14.33 | $6.41 |
| Change, 1 year | 49.7% | −9.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −45.0% | 89.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.83 | 0.85 |
| Employees | 840 | 731 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 (better) | 9 |
| Valuation score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Dividend score | 2 | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.7× | 0.5× (better) |
| P/B | 0.9× (better) | 0.9× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 77.3× |
| P/FCF | 8.2× (better) | 11.4× |
| FCF yield | 12.2% (better) | 8.7% |
| Fair value | $15.17 | $9.30 |
| Margin of safety | 5.6% | 31.1% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −32.8% | −19.0% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −12.4% | 5.5% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −118% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −117% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 38.5% (better) | 37.5% |
| Operating margin | −6.0% | −2.5% (better) |
| Net margin | −8.7% | −1.3% (better) |
| FCF margin | 9.1% (better) | 4.6% |
| Return on equity | −9.9% | −2.2% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −5.7% | −3.4% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.03 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | −4.42 |
| Interest coverage | – | −15.2× |
| Current ratio | 3.03 (better) | 2.53 |
| Altman Z-score | 3.45 (better) | 2.10 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.2% (better) | 1.6% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 4.2% | – |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.19% |
| Shareholder yield | 3.2% (better) | 1.7% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 73.3% | 33.9% |
| Held by insiders | 9.2% | 11.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | $320K |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.0% | 1.6% |
Go deeper
- HOFT stock overview
- HOFT income statement
- HOFT valuation and score
- VIRC stock overview
- VIRC income statement
- VIRC valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.