Hecla Mining vs Teck Resources
HL and TECK side by side, both in mining & quarrying of nonmetallic minerals (no fuels). Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How HL and TECK compare
Hecla Mining grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (84.1% versus 18.7% for Teck Resources).
Hecla Mining keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 21.0% compared with 13.0% at Teck Resources.
Hecla Mining pays a dividend yielding 0.12%; Teck Resources does not pay one.
Hecla Mining scores higher on the StockData Score (22 against 8 for Teck Resources), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | HL | TECK |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $8.8B | – |
| Share price | $13.10 | $60.19 |
| Change, 1 year | −15.6% | 37.6% |
| Change, 5 years | 117% | 131% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.23 | 1.07 |
| Employees | 1,865 | – |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 22 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 23.4× | – |
| P/S | 4.8× | – |
| P/B | 3.1× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.0× | – |
| P/FCF | 16.6× | – |
| FCF yield | 6.0% | – |
| Fair value | $21.72 | – |
| Margin of safety | 39.7% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 84.1% (better) | 18.7% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 15.5% (better) | 3.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 92.2% | 245% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 80.6% | 263% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 52.6% (better) | 24.7% |
| Operating margin | 45.2% (better) | 20.9% |
| Net margin | 21.0% (better) | 13.0% |
| FCF margin | 29.2% (better) | −3.3% |
| Return on equity | 14.5% (better) | 5.5% |
| Return on invested capital | 26.5% (better) | 6.2% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 (better) | 0.16 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.76 | −0.28 |
| Interest coverage | – | 2.5× |
| Current ratio | 5.96 (better) | 2.54 |
| Altman Z-score | 11.50 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 | 8 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.12% | – |
| Payout ratio | 2.8% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 19.7% | – |
| Buyback yield | 0.05% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 0.17% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 72.2% | 70.1% |
| Held by insiders | 0.79% | 0.00% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$7.7M | – |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.7% | – |
Go deeper
- HL stock overview
- HL income statement
- HL valuation and score
- TECK stock overview
- TECK income statement
- TECK valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.