StockData

Hippo vs Porch

HIPO and PRCH side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How HIPO and PRCH compare

Porch is the larger company, worth 2.8 times as much as Hippo ($2.8B against $991M).

On earnings, Hippo is cheaper: it trades at 30.5× trailing earnings, against 421× for Porch.

Hippo grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (20.6% versus 15.6% for Porch).

Hippo keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 5.9% compared with 1.8% at Porch.

Porch scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 4 for Hippo), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricHIPOPRCH
Size and price
Market cap$991M$2.8B
Share price$37.21$21.05
Change, 1 year10.7%107%
Change, 5 years−61.6%−13.9%
Beta (5Y)1.422.18
Employees540803
StockData Score
Total score47 (better)
Valuation score00
Growth score23 (better)
Performance score22
Health score02 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E30.5× (better)421×
P/S1.8× (better)5.3×
P/B–370×
EV/EBITDA–42.5×
P/FCF7.8× (better)24.5×
FCF yield12.8% (better)4.1%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)20.6% (better)15.6%
Revenue growth, 5Y average55.5% (better)46.2%
Net income growth (TTM)−66.6% (better)−68.6%
EPS growth (TTM)−66.9% (better)−81.5%
Profitability
Gross margin–72.1%
Operating margin–8.0%
Net margin5.9% (better)1.8%
FCF margin23.4% (better)21.5%
Return on equity7.6%–
Return on invested capital–12.6%
Financial health
Debt / equity–53.60
Net debt / EBITDA–2.47
Interest coverage–0.7×
Current ratio–1.46
Altman Z-score−0.151.80 (better)
Piotroski F-score57 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield−0.35%0.09% (better)
Shareholder yield−0.35%0.09% (better)
Ownership
Held by institutions43.7%65.8%
Held by insiders9.3%20.8%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$2.3M (better)−$43.4M
Short interest, % of float3.3%16.5%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.