Here vs Tokyo Lifestyle
HERE and TKLF side by side, both in miscellaneous retail. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How HERE and TKLF compare
Here grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (807% versus 77.6% for Tokyo Lifestyle).
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | HERE | TKLF |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $1.58 | $1.53 |
| Change, 1 year | −73.7% | −49.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.00 | 0.34 |
| Employees | 368 | 68 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 6 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 807% (better) | 77.6% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −19.4% | 10.7% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −89.2% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −87.5% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −35.6% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 33.1% | – |
| Operating margin | −49.3% | 0.86% (better) |
| Net margin | – | 0.19% |
| FCF margin | −27.2% | −2.8% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 1.7% |
| Return on invested capital | −127% | 1.6% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 1.55 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 14.07 |
| Interest coverage | – | 1.6× |
| Current ratio | 6.01 (better) | 1.30 |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 2 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Payout ratio | – | 74.1% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 0.72% | 0.00% |
| Held by insiders | 51.7% | 91.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | $456K |
Go deeper
- HERE stock overview
- HERE income statement
- HERE valuation and score
- TKLF stock overview
- TKLF income statement
- TKLF valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.