StockData

Hyperscale Data vs STAK

GPUS and STAK side by side, both in construction, mining, and materials handling. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How GPUS and STAK compare

STAK keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 1.5% compared with −71.0% at Hyperscale Data.

STAK scores higher on the StockData Score (3 against 2 for Hyperscale Data), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricGPUSSTAK
Size and price
Market cap$118M–
Share price$0.168$1.54
Change, 1 year−90.0%170%
Change, 5 years−100%–
Beta (5Y)0.94–
Employees61245
StockData Score
Total score23 (better)
Valuation score1 (better)0
Growth score02 (better)
Performance score1 (better)0
Health score01 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S0.9×–
P/B1.1×–
FCF yield−88.1%–
Fair value$0.144–
Margin of safety−16.7%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)–13.2%
Revenue growth, 5Y average33.7%–
Profitability
Gross margin26.1%26.4% (better)
Operating margin−69.3%3.8% (better)
Net margin−71.0%1.5% (better)
FCF margin−79.8%–
Return on equity−160%2.9% (better)
Return on invested capital−194%2.5% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity–0.81
Net debt / EBITDA–8.16
Interest coverage−6.0×4.5× (better)
Current ratio0.571.72 (better)
Altman Z-score−3.54–
Piotroski F-score4 (better)2
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%–
Ownership
Held by insiders54.5%47.9%
Insider net buying, 12 months$7.2M–
Short interest, % of float4.7%13.0%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.