StockData

Greenlane vs TaoWeave

GNLN and TWAV side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How GNLN and TWAV compare

TaoWeave is the larger company, worth 7.7 times as much as Greenlane ($4.8M against $616K).

TaoWeave grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−0.59% versus −67.0% for Greenlane).

TaoWeave keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −120% compared with −4631% at Greenlane.

TaoWeave scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 6 for Greenlane), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricGNLNTWAV
Size and price
Market cap$616K$4.8M
Share price$0.886$1.23
Change, 1 year−95.9%−53.1%
Change, 5 years−100%−99.8%
Beta (5Y)2.021.87
Employees117
StockData Score
Total score610 (better)
Valuation score13 (better)
Growth score01 (better)
Performance score01 (better)
Health score55
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S0.2× (better)2.0×
P/B0.0× (better)0.7×
Fair value–$2.61
Margin of safety–52.9%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−67.0%−0.59% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average−49.9%−30.8% (better)
Profitability
Gross margin−492%53.3% (better)
Operating margin−2151%−112% (better)
Net margin−4631%−120% (better)
Return on equity−534%−33.7% (better)
Return on invested capital−264%−39.6% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.000.00
Current ratio2.365.96 (better)
Altman Z-score−23.00 (better)−38.10
Piotroski F-score35 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions4.2%5.1%
Held by insiders15.1%7.4%
Insider net buying, 12 months–$0
Short interest, % of float0.15%0.84%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.