Globus Maritime vs United Maritime
GLBS and USEA side by side, both in water transportation. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How GLBS and USEA compare
Globus Maritime grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (26.8% versus −16.8% for United Maritime).
Globus Maritime scores higher on the StockData Score (3 against 0 for United Maritime), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | GLBS | USEA |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $2.99 | $2.46 |
| Change, 1 year | 151% | 58.2% |
| Change, 5 years | 20.1% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.68 | 0.42 |
| Employees | 25 | 1,000 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 26.8% (better) | −16.8% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 30.3% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −500% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 10.2% (better) | −1.2% |
| Net margin | – | −16.4% |
| FCF margin | 25.7% (better) | 4.1% |
| Return on equity | – | −11.3% |
| Return on invested capital | – | −0.31% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 1.32 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 5.68 | – |
| Interest coverage | 0.6× (better) | −0.1× |
| Current ratio | 2.77 (better) | 0.96 |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 3 |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 3.1% | 6.7% |
| Held by insiders | 36.8% | 25.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $1.6M (better) | $52.0K |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.0% | 20.2% |
Go deeper
- GLBS stock overview
- GLBS income statement
- GLBS valuation and score
- USEA stock overview
- USEA income statement
- USEA valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.