Globus Maritime vs Icon Energy
GLBS and ICON side by side, both in water transportation. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How GLBS and ICON compare
Icon Energy grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (3786% versus 26.8% for Globus Maritime).
Globus Maritime scores higher on the StockData Score (3 against 2 for Icon Energy), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | GLBS | ICON |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $2.91 | $0.905 |
| Change, 1 year | 143% | −84.7% |
| Change, 5 years | 16.9% | −99.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.68 | – |
| Employees | 25 | – |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 26.8% | 3786% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 30.3% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −500% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 10.2% | 10.8% (better) |
| Net margin | – | −251% |
| FCF margin | 25.7% (better) | −316% |
| Return on equity | – | −17.6% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 0.78% |
| Financial health | ||
| Net debt / EBITDA | 5.68 | – |
| Interest coverage | 0.6× (better) | 0.0× |
| Current ratio | 2.77 (better) | 1.55 |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 5 |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 3.1% | 3.1% |
| Held by insiders | 36.8% | – |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $1.6M | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.0% | – |
Go deeper
- GLBS stock overview
- GLBS income statement
- GLBS valuation and score
- ICON stock overview
- ICON income statement
- ICON valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.