GE Vernova vs SLB
GEV and SLB side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How GEV and SLB compare
GE Vernova is the larger company, worth 2.8 times as much as SLB ($213B against $76.3B).
On earnings, GE Vernova is cheaper: it trades at 21.1× trailing earnings, against 25.1× for SLB.
GE Vernova grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (16.9% versus 4.6% for SLB).
GE Vernova keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 23.5% compared with 8.4% at SLB.
Both pay dividends: GE Vernova yields 0.19% and SLB 2.3%.
GE Vernova scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 8 for SLB), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | GEV | SLB |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $213B | $76.3B |
| Share price | $803.13 | $51.67 |
| Change, 1 year | 39.6% | 43.2% |
| Change, 5 years | – | 71.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.39 | 0.74 |
| Employees | 75K | 109K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 21.1× (better) | 25.1× |
| P/S | 4.8× | 2.1× (better) |
| P/B | 18.7× | 2.9× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 70.7× | 11.7× (better) |
| P/FCF | 12.4× (better) | 16.7× |
| FCF yield | 8.1% (better) | 6.0% |
| Fair value | – | $38.99 |
| Margin of safety | – | −32.5% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 16.9% (better) | 4.6% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 8.6% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 508% (better) | −15.0% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 522% (better) | −20.5% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 21.7% | – |
| Operating margin | 6.4% | – |
| Net margin | 23.5% (better) | 8.4% |
| FCF margin | 38.9% (better) | 12.4% |
| Return on equity | 104% (better) | 12.0% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.25 (better) | 0.43 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −4.93 | 1.05 (better) |
| Current ratio | 0.83 | 1.39 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.40 | 2.83 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.19% | 2.3% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 4.6% | 55.9% |
| Years of dividend growth | 1 | – |
| Buyback yield | 3.0% (better) | 2.3% |
| Shareholder yield | 3.2% | 4.6% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 80.3% | 92.9% |
| Held by insiders | 0.10% | 0.18% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$11.5M (better) | −$26.1M |
| Superinvestors holding | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.8% | 3.9% |
Go deeper
- GEV stock overview
- GEV income statement
- GEV valuation and score
- SLB stock overview
- SLB income statement
- SLB valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.