Gemini Space Station vs TeraWulf
GEMI and WULF side by side, both in finance services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How GEMI and WULF compare
TeraWulf is the larger company, worth 20 times as much as Gemini Space Station ($6.3B against $308M).
Gemini Space Station grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (51.5% versus 13.9% for TeraWulf).
Gemini Space Station keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −250% compared with −411% at TeraWulf.
Gemini Space Station scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 2 for TeraWulf), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | GEMI | WULF |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $308M | $6.3B |
| Share price | $2.38 | $12.62 |
| Change, 1 year | −82.8% | −0.16% |
| Change, 5 years | – | −70.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.78 | 2.31 |
| Employees | 650 | 141 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 1.5× (better) | 33.0× |
| P/B | 0.7× (better) | 7.2× |
| FCF yield | −99.8% | −49.4% (better) |
| Fair value | $3.94 | $3.93 |
| Margin of safety | 39.7% (better) | −221% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 51.5% (better) | 13.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 65.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 25.7% |
| Operating margin | −195% (better) | −250% |
| Net margin | −250% (better) | −411% |
| FCF margin | −149% (better) | −1631% |
| Return on equity | – | −140% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Interest coverage | – | −2.0× |
| Current ratio | 1.30 (better) | 0.97 |
| Altman Z-score | −2.43 | 0.05 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.00% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Buyback yield | – | −19.1% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% (better) | −19.1% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 14.4% | 79.6% |
| Held by insiders | – | 20.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$483K (better) | −$35.7M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 30.9% |
Go deeper
- GEMI stock overview
- GEMI income statement
- GEMI valuation and score
- WULF stock overview
- WULF income statement
- WULF valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.