GigaCloud Technology vs Insight Enterprises
GCT and NSIT side by side, both in nonstore retailers. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How GCT and NSIT compare
GigaCloud Technology and Insight Enterprises are about the same size, with market caps of $4.8B and $5.0B.
On earnings, GigaCloud Technology is cheaper: it trades at 14.3× trailing earnings, against 28.4× for Insight Enterprises.
GigaCloud Technology grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (27.4% versus 9.0% for Insight Enterprises).
GigaCloud Technology keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 10.9% compared with 2.0% at Insight Enterprises.
GigaCloud Technology scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 8 for Insight Enterprises), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | GCT | NSIT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $4.8B | $5.0B |
| Share price | $66.63 | $168.76 |
| Change, 1 year | 107% | 84.1% |
| Change, 5 years | – | 64.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 2.11 | 0.98 |
| Employees | 1,644 | 15K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 18 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Performance score | 6 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 14.3× (better) | 28.4× |
| P/S | 3.1× | 0.5× (better) |
| P/B | 8.4× | 3.2× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 21.9× | 12.6× (better) |
| P/FCF | 34.9× | 18.1× (better) |
| PEG | 0.18 | – |
| FCF yield | 2.9% | 5.5% (better) |
| Fair value | $62.79 | $156.25 |
| Margin of safety | −6.1% (better) | −8.0% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 27.4% (better) | 9.0% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 36.2% (better) | −0.22% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 30.6% (better) | 27.6% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 39.6% (better) | 38.7% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 21.4% (better) | −0.04% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 24.4% (better) | 22.0% |
| Operating margin | 12.2% (better) | 4.1% |
| Net margin | 10.9% (better) | 2.0% |
| FCF margin | 8.8% (better) | 3.0% |
| Return on equity | 33.1% (better) | 11.5% |
| Return on invested capital | 132% (better) | 9.6% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.96 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 2.29 |
| Interest coverage | 446× (better) | 3.8× |
| Current ratio | 2.17 (better) | 1.19 |
| Altman Z-score | 6.59 (better) | 1.57 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 1.5% | 4.5% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 1.5% | 4.5% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 33.5% | 104% |
| Held by insiders | 36.4% | 6.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$47.4M | −$519K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.0% | 2.9% |
Go deeper
- GCT stock overview
- GCT income statement
- GCT valuation and score
- NSIT stock overview
- NSIT income statement
- NSIT valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.