StockData

Fiverr International vs Payoneer Global

FVRR and PAYO side by side, both in miscellaneous business services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How FVRR and PAYO compare

Fiverr International grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (10.1% versus 4.6% for Payoneer Global).

Fiverr International keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 4.9% compared with 4.7% at Payoneer Global.

Payoneer Global scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 4 for Fiverr International), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricFVRRPAYO
Size and price
Market cap–$2.4B
Share price$8.05$7.20
Change, 1 year−63.3%25.2%
Change, 5 years−95.0%−16.3%
Beta (5Y)1.751.17
Employees5282,540
StockData Score
Total score411 (better)
Valuation score00
Growth score12 (better)
Performance score24 (better)
Health score15 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E–48.0×
P/S–2.2×
P/B–3.7×
EV/EBITDA–11.4×
P/FCF–12.1×
FCF yield–8.3%
Fair value–$5.73
Margin of safety–−25.7%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)10.1% (better)4.6%
Revenue growth, 5Y average17.9%25.0% (better)
Net income growth (TTM)15.0% (better)−29.4%
EPS growth (TTM)16.7% (better)−16.7%
Profitability
Gross margin81.6%–
Operating margin−0.27%9.3% (better)
Net margin4.9% (better)4.7%
FCF margin24.1% (better)18.6%
Return on equity5.4%7.2% (better)
Return on invested capital−1.9%19.1% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity–0.00
Interest coverage−0.6×–
Current ratio1.93 (better)1.02
Altman Z-score–0.40
Piotroski F-score8 (better)6
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield–7.0%
Shareholder yield–7.0%
Ownership
Held by institutions45.6%89.5%
Held by insiders17.1%21.0%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$1.5M−$175K (better)
Short interest, % of float8.8%5.2%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.