Six Flags Entertainment vs Lucky Strike Entertainment
FUN and LUCK side by side, both in amusement and recreation services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FUN and LUCK compare
Six Flags Entertainment is the larger company, worth 2.6 times as much as Lucky Strike Entertainment ($1.1B against $439M).
Lucky Strike Entertainment grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (1.8% versus −7.1% for Six Flags Entertainment).
Lucky Strike Entertainment keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −3.8% compared with −31.9% at Six Flags Entertainment.
Lucky Strike Entertainment pays a dividend yielding 7.5%; Six Flags Entertainment does not pay one.
Lucky Strike Entertainment scores higher on the StockData Score (5 against 3 for Six Flags Entertainment), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FUN | LUCK |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.1B | $439M |
| Share price | $11.10 | $3.22 |
| Change, 1 year | −32.1% | −59.4% |
| Change, 5 years | −77.0% | −68.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.01 | 0.72 |
| Employees | 4,225 | 14K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.4× | 0.3× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 8.3× |
| P/FCF | 7.7× (better) | 24.2× |
| FCF yield | 13.0% (better) | 4.1% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −7.1% | 1.8% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 76.4% (better) | 25.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 91.5% | – |
| Operating margin | −18.8% | 10.9% (better) |
| Net margin | −31.9% | −3.8% (better) |
| FCF margin | 5.1% (better) | 1.4% |
| Return on equity | −510% | – |
| Return on invested capital | −8.7% | 8.2% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 6.61 |
| Current ratio | 0.52 (better) | 0.50 |
| Altman Z-score | −0.38 | 0.41 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 7.5% |
| Buyback yield | – | 6.9% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 14.3% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 104% | 50.4% |
| Held by insiders | 14.2% | – |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $21.5M (better) | $1.0M |
| Superinvestors holding | 3 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 31.7% | – |
Go deeper
- FUN stock overview
- FUN income statement
- FUN valuation and score
- LUCK stock overview
- LUCK income statement
- LUCK valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.