Freedom vs Oppenheimer
FRHC and OPY side by side, both in security brokers, dealers, and flotation. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FRHC and OPY compare
Freedom is the larger company, worth 10 times as much as Oppenheimer ($10.0B against $956M).
On earnings, Oppenheimer is cheaper: it trades at 12.1× trailing earnings, against 61.7× for Freedom.
Freedom grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (15.3% versus 13.9% for Oppenheimer).
Freedom keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 6.5% compared with 4.9% at Oppenheimer.
Oppenheimer pays a dividend yielding 0.85%; Freedom does not pay one.
Oppenheimer scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 7 for Freedom), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FRHC | OPY |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $10.0B | $956M |
| Share price | $156.02 | $89.25 |
| Change, 1 year | 11.5% | 28.0% |
| Change, 5 years | 119% | 71.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.95 | 0.82 |
| Employees | 12K | 2,947 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 14 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 1 | 1 |
| Health score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 61.7× | 12.1× (better) |
| P/S | 4.2× | 0.5× (better) |
| P/B | 6.5× | 1.0× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 33.5× | 7.3× (better) |
| P/FCF | – | 16.7× |
| PEG | – | 0.17 |
| FCF yield | −8.9% | 6.0% (better) |
| Fair value | $73.55 | $113.67 |
| Margin of safety | −112% | 21.5% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 15.3% (better) | 13.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 44.6% (better) | 6.4% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 95.1% (better) | 2.2% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 94.6% (better) | −0.94% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −0.39% | 7.0% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 95.8% | – |
| Operating margin | – | 7.2% |
| Net margin | 6.5% (better) | 4.9% |
| FCF margin | −37.2% | 3.3% (better) |
| Return on equity | 11.2% (better) | 9.1% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 9.4% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.77 | 1.04 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.85% |
| Payout ratio | – | 21.5% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 2 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | −13.4% |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.24% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 1.1% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 3.5% | 41.7% |
| Held by insiders | 68.1% | 6.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$8.7M | −$424K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.1% | 1.1% |
Go deeper
- FRHC stock overview
- FRHC income statement
- FRHC valuation and score
- OPY stock overview
- OPY income statement
- OPY valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.