StockData

Fly-E vs LOBO Technologies

FLYE and LOBO side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How FLYE and LOBO compare

LOBO Technologies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (9.6% versus −25.0% for Fly-E).

LOBO Technologies keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −23.6% compared with −48.6% at Fly-E.

Fly-E scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 3 for LOBO Technologies), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricFLYELOBO
Size and price
Market cap$3.2M–
Share price$1.96$0.330
Change, 1 year−63.1%−51.1%
Beta (5Y)1.330.55
Employees12108
StockData Score
Total score8 (better)3
Valuation score3 (better)0
Growth score02 (better)
Performance score00
Health score5 (better)1
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S0.2×–
P/B0.3×–
FCF yield−435%–
Fair value$7.92–
Margin of safety75.2%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−25.0%9.6% (better)
Profitability
Gross margin24.4% (better)13.3%
Operating margin−33.8%−17.5% (better)
Net margin−48.6%−23.6% (better)
FCF margin−73.0%−9.2% (better)
Return on equity−85.7%−66.0% (better)
Return on invested capital−39.8%−31.2% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.000.57 (better)
Interest coverage–−49.1×
Current ratio1.68 (better)1.39
Altman Z-score−0.51–
Piotroski F-score23 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield−543%–
Shareholder yield−543%–
Ownership
Held by institutions4.1%–
Held by insiders0.00%30.9%
Short interest, % of float3.6%3.0%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.