Flowco vs Solaris Energy Infrastructure
FLOC and SEI side by side, both in construction, mining, and materials handling. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FLOC and SEI compare
Solaris Energy Infrastructure is the larger company, worth 2.6 times as much as Flowco ($5.0B against $1.9B).
Solaris Energy Infrastructure grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (73.8% versus 20.4% for Flowco).
Solaris Energy Infrastructure keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 8.0% compared with 6.4% at Flowco.
Both pay dividends: Flowco yields 1.6% and Solaris Energy Infrastructure 0.74%.
Solaris Energy Infrastructure scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 9 for Flowco), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FLOC | SEI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.9B | $5.0B |
| Share price | $20.89 | $64.80 |
| Change, 1 year | 22.5% | 28.7% |
| Change, 5 years | – | 879% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.89 | 1.42 |
| Employees | 1,281 | 468 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 12 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 2.1× (better) | 5.3× |
| P/B | 3.5× (better) | 3.9× |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.1× (better) | 18.7× |
| P/FCF | 7.9× | – |
| FCF yield | 12.6% (better) | −21.4% |
| Fair value | $10.34 | $31.65 |
| Margin of safety | −102% (better) | −105% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 20.4% | 73.8% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 43.3% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 96.6% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 53.9% | – |
| Operating margin | 18.6% | 22.8% (better) |
| Net margin | 6.4% | 8.0% (better) |
| FCF margin | 26.4% (better) | −114% |
| Return on equity | 12.5% (better) | 8.2% |
| Return on invested capital | 23.7% (better) | 10.5% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.67 (better) | 1.35 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.65 (better) | 3.73 |
| Interest coverage | 8.7× (better) | 4.4× |
| Current ratio | 3.19 (better) | 2.10 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.70 (better) | 1.36 |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.6% (better) | 0.74% |
| Payout ratio | – | 38.9% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 2.7% |
| Buyback yield | 0.88% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 2.5% (better) | 0.74% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 48.3% | 92.8% |
| Held by insiders | 53.2% | 34.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$384M | −$299M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 9.0% | 33.3% |
Go deeper
- FLOC stock overview
- FLOC income statement
- FLOC valuation and score
- SEI stock overview
- SEI income statement
- SEI valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.