Flagstar Bank, National Association vs Valley National Bancorp
FLG and VLY side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FLG and VLY compare
Valley National Bancorp is the larger company, worth 1.8 times as much as Flagstar Bank, National Association ($7.9B against $4.4B).
On earnings, Valley National Bancorp is cheaper: it trades at 11.4× trailing earnings, against 69.9× for Flagstar Bank, National Association.
Valley National Bancorp grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (13.7% versus −1.4% for Flagstar Bank, National Association).
Valley National Bancorp keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 33.1% compared with 4.6% at Flagstar Bank, National Association.
Both pay dividends: Flagstar Bank, National Association yields 0.38% and Valley National Bancorp 3.1%.
Valley National Bancorp scores higher on the StockData Score (21 against 9 for Flagstar Bank, National Association), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FLG | VLY |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $4.4B | $7.9B |
| Share price | $10.48 | $14.34 |
| Change, 1 year | −5.1% | 29.4% |
| Change, 5 years | −71.8% | 0.07% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.97 | 0.96 |
| Employees | 5,631 | 3,155 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 21 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 69.9× | 11.4× (better) |
| P/S | 2.1× (better) | 3.6× |
| P/B | 0.6× (better) | 1.0× |
| P/FCF | – | 8.5× |
| FCF yield | – | 11.8% |
| Fair value | – | $14.90 |
| Margin of safety | – | 3.7% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −1.4% | 13.7% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 148% (better) | 9.2% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 42.1% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 43.2% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 1.7% |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 4.6% | 33.1% (better) |
| FCF margin | – | 42.0% |
| Return on equity | 1.2% | 9.4% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.69 | 0.01 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 0.04 | 0.16 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.38% | 3.1% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 15.6% | 33.5% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 0.00% |
| Buyback yield | – | 1.9% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.38% | 5.0% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 88.3% | 77.1% |
| Held by insiders | 28.4% | 14.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $599K (better) | −$1.6M |
| Short interest, % of float | 14.6% | – |
Go deeper
- FLG stock overview
- FLG income statement
- FLG valuation and score
- VLY stock overview
- VLY income statement
- VLY valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.