StockData

Foghorn Therapeutics vs Zymeworks

FHTX and ZYME side by side, both in drugs. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How FHTX and ZYME compare

Zymeworks is the larger company, worth 17 times as much as Foghorn Therapeutics ($2.1B against $124M).

On earnings, Foghorn Therapeutics is cheaper: it trades at 29.9× trailing earnings, against 55.9× for Zymeworks.

Foghorn Therapeutics grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (357% versus 97.8% for Zymeworks).

Zymeworks keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 16.3% compared with 8.4% at Foghorn Therapeutics.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricFHTXZYME
Size and price
Market cap$124M$2.1B
Share price$2.09$29.07
Change, 1 year−52.7%61.1%
Change, 5 years−84.7%46.7%
Beta (5Y)1.870.84
Employees106264
StockData Score
Total score1010
Valuation score1 (better)0
Growth score2 (better)1
Performance score24 (better)
Health score55
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E29.9× (better)55.9×
P/S1.1× (better)7.8×
P/B–8.0×
EV/EBITDA11.5× (better)44.4×
FCF yield−67.4%−5.5% (better)
Fair value$2.08$12.06
Margin of safety−0.44% (better)−141%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)357% (better)97.8%
Revenue growth, 5Y average135% (better)22.2%
Profitability
Operating margin2.1%16.6% (better)
Net margin8.4%16.3% (better)
FCF margin−74.6%−42.4% (better)
Return on equity–15.0%
Return on invested capital–21.4%
Financial health
Debt / equity–0.00
Current ratio4.24 (better)3.30
Altman Z-score−2.660.87 (better)
Piotroski F-score26 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield–8.0%
Shareholder yield0.00%8.0% (better)
Ownership
Held by institutions75.6%98.1%
Held by insiders36.3%58.9%
Insider net buying, 12 months–−$5.0M
Short interest, % of float6.0%20.3%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.