StockData

Foghorn Therapeutics vs Arcus Biosciences

FHTX and RCUS side by side, both in drugs. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How FHTX and RCUS compare

Arcus Biosciences is the larger company, worth 19 times as much as Foghorn Therapeutics ($2.3B against $122M).

Foghorn Therapeutics grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (357% versus −58.3% for Arcus Biosciences).

Foghorn Therapeutics keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 8.4% compared with −453% at Arcus Biosciences.

Foghorn Therapeutics scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 3 for Arcus Biosciences), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricFHTXRCUS
Size and price
Market cap$122M$2.3B
Share price$2.05$17.77
Change, 1 year−53.8%−12.4%
Change, 5 years−85.0%−62.6%
Beta (5Y)1.871.41
Employees106601
StockData Score
Total score11 (better)3
Valuation score2 (better)0
Growth score22
Performance score2 (better)0
Health score5 (better)1
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E29.3×–
P/S1.1× (better)22.6×
P/B–6.3×
EV/EBITDA10.8×–
FCF yield−68.7%−20.6% (better)
Fair value$2.07$5.88
Margin of safety1.1% (better)−202%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)357% (better)−58.3%
Revenue growth, 5Y average135% (better)25.9%
Profitability
Operating margin2.1% (better)−475%
Net margin8.4% (better)−453%
FCF margin−74.6% (better)−466%
Return on equity–−114%
Financial health
Interest coverage–−43.2×
Current ratio4.24 (better)3.34
Altman Z-score−2.66−1.30 (better)
Piotroski F-score2 (better)1
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield–−12.3%
Shareholder yield0.00% (better)−12.3%
Ownership
Held by institutions75.6%96.3%
Held by insiders36.3%31.7%
Insider net buying, 12 months–−$9.3M
Short interest, % of float6.0%15.2%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.