Phoenix New Media vs Newsmax
FENG and NMAX side by side, both in communications. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FENG and NMAX compare
Newsmax grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (11.1% versus 8.8% for Phoenix New Media).
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FENG | NMAX |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $1000M |
| Share price | $1.35 | $7.74 |
| Change, 1 year | −40.5% | −14.0% |
| Change, 5 years | −81.2% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.39 | 0.07 |
| Employees | 611 | 500 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 7 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Health score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | – | 4.9× |
| P/B | – | 8.8× |
| FCF yield | – | −7.2% |
| Fair value | – | $1.11 |
| Margin of safety | – | −599% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 8.8% | 11.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −8.7% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 48.9% (better) | 39.6% |
| Operating margin | −4.5% (better) | −7.4% |
| Net margin | – | −3.2% |
| FCF margin | −2.1% (better) | −35.2% |
| Return on equity | – | −5.8% |
| Return on invested capital | −2.9% (better) | −14.8% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | – | −1054.0× |
| Current ratio | 2.85 (better) | 2.39 |
| Altman Z-score | – | 4.41 |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | – | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 0.03% | 28.5% |
| Held by insiders | 0.00% | 63.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$6.2M |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 10.6% |
Go deeper
- FENG stock overview
- FENG income statement
- FENG valuation and score
- NMAX stock overview
- NMAX income statement
- NMAX valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.