Frequency Electronics vs Transcat
FEIM and TRNS side by side, both in laboratory apparatus and analytical, optical, measuring, and controlling instruments. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FEIM and TRNS compare
Transcat is the larger company, worth 1.4 times as much as Frequency Electronics ($974M against $719M).
On earnings, Frequency Electronics is cheaper: it trades at 255× trailing earnings, against 281× for Transcat.
Transcat grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (20.9% versus 6.3% for Frequency Electronics).
Frequency Electronics keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 3.7% compared with 0.99% at Transcat.
Frequency Electronics scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 9 for Transcat), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FEIM | TRNS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $719M | $974M |
| Share price | $63.77 | $104.08 |
| Change, 1 year | 118% | 87.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 553% | 8.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.76 | 0.95 |
| Employees | 242 | 1,413 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 (better) | 9 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 255× (better) | 281× |
| P/S | 9.9× | 2.8× (better) |
| P/B | 6.0× | 3.2× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 185× | 27.5× (better) |
| P/FCF | – | 38.4× |
| FCF yield | −0.03% | 2.6% (better) |
| Fair value | $9.87 | $79.59 |
| Margin of safety | −546% | −30.8% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 6.3% | 20.9% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 3.1% | 13.9% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −87.8% | −74.2% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −89.0% | −74.1% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −11.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 33.0% (better) | 32.5% |
| Operating margin | 2.5% | 3.3% (better) |
| Net margin | 3.7% (better) | 0.99% |
| FCF margin | −0.25% | 7.3% (better) |
| Return on equity | 3.0% (better) | 1.2% |
| Return on invested capital | 3.4% (better) | 2.0% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.36 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 2.65 |
| Interest coverage | 22.4× (better) | 2.1× |
| Current ratio | 5.34 (better) | 2.49 |
| Altman Z-score | 14.07 (better) | 4.29 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 0.14% | 0.24% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 0.14% | 0.24% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 66.6% | 103% |
| Held by insiders | 24.5% | 2.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$37.5M | −$344K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 11.1% | 4.2% |
Go deeper
- FEIM stock overview
- FEIM income statement
- FEIM valuation and score
- TRNS stock overview
- TRNS income statement
- TRNS valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.